Courtroom etiquette & ethics?

Is it proper for a judge to allow one party to describe the event (untruthfully) and then not ask for the counter parties' description of the event? With even the counter party asking may I explain or may I tell you, is that enough for a judge to raise his temper & voice because he doesn't want to hear it? Even if facts are misconstrued? I always thought that both parties should have the ability to tell their sides of the story. Any opinions?